Nettet6. nov. 2024 · As the cost of environmental clean up increases, public and private litigants are asserting broad liability theories that expand traditional rules governing recovery against parent and successor corporations and lenders with secured interests in contaminated property. NettetThe courts consistently held that a lender would not be liable unless and until: (i) the secured creditor foreclosed on contaminated property; or (ii) the creditor has become active in the day-to-day management of the borrower's facility. The Fleet Factors decision changed that analysis. The court stated:
Michael R. Goldstein - Managing Partner - The Goldstein Environmental …
Nettet17. nov. 2024 · However, legislation across Canada is widely used to impose some or all of the costs of recovery, recycling and disposal of goods on the producers of waste. These laws are intended to incentivise producers to design products that can be disposed of responsibly. 15. Environmental Disclosure and Information. http://www.shulmanrogers.com/media/publication/222_Lender%20Liability%20Handout%202-13-17.pdf g4s referral
Avoiding Lender Liability for Environmental …
NettetEnvironmental Issues Affecting Lenders Environmental regulations and case law affect lenders in three broad areas: lender liability, borrower liability, and constraints on … Nettet8. mar. 2011 · In United States-v-Fleet Factors Corp. (1990) the Court found the lender liable for environmental damage, reasoning that the lender’s involvement in the financial management of the borrower gave it the “capacity to influence the corporation’s treatment of hazardous waste”. Nettet23. apr. 2014 · Nonetheless, lenders may be held liable under various theories of banking, environmental, tort, and corporate law. This article examines the justifications for holding lenders liable and the limits of those justifications, analyzes the American model that explicitly regulates lenders' liability, and explores potential lender liability under … glass drinking bottles wholesale